Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Principle of Sufficient Reason, as Leibniz invoked it... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→God did not abstain from working before creating heaven and earth, because there was no time before God's creation.

    The Principle of Sufficient Reason, as Leibniz invoked it against Newton, demands an explanation for the specific moment of creation that mere temporal eliminativism cannot supply.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If time itself began at creation, there is no prior temporal framework to explain why creation occurred then rather than never.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz's PSR requires that every contingent fact have a sufficient reason; the universe's existence is contingent, demanding explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Temporal eliminativism (denying objective time) cannot ground why physical laws actualized at some moments but not others without circularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If time is metaphysically fundamental to causation and explanation, asking why creation occurred 'when' presupposes the very thing being explained.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.PSR itself may be unprovable or false; rejecting it avoids the problem entirely without requiring temporal eliminativism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Brute facts and foundational explanations may legitimately end inquiry; requiring reasons for all contingencies leads to infinite regress.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Leibniz
    Leibniz is a German philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s-1700s who developed calculus (a powerful math tool for measuring change and areas) independently around the same time as Isaac Newton. He's famous for creating much of the notation we still use in mathematics today and for arguing that everything in the universe follows logical principles. His ideas profoundly influenced modern science, mathematics, and philosophy, making him one of history's most important thinkers.
    Newton
    # Newton A Newton is a unit of measurement that describes force—basically, the push or pull needed to move something. It's named after Sir Isaac Newton, an English scientist from the 1600s who discovered the fundamental laws explaining how objects move and how gravity works. You encounter Newtons all the time: for example, the force you apply when pushing a door or the weight of an apple falling from a tree can be measured in Newtons.
    Principle of Sufficient Reason(Leibniz's foundational metaphysical principle underwriting the explicability of all events and phenomena.)
    Nothing takes place without a sufficient reason; nothing occurs for which it would be impossible for someone who has enough knowledge of things to give a reason adequate to determine why the thing is as it is and not otherwise.
    creation (in philosophy)(what Leibniz believed needed an explanation that temporal eliminativism couldn't provide)
    The moment or event when the universe or something in it came into existence from nothing or from God, depending on the philosophical or religious view.
    temporal eliminativism(the philosophical approach the statement suggests cannot adequately explain creation)
    The view that time itself might not be a real, fundamental part of the universe—it's just how we perceive things happening in sequence.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Afterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    Brute facts and foundational explanations may legitimately end inquiry; requirin...God did not abstain from working before creating heaven and earth, because there...If time is metaphysically fundamental to causation and explanation, asking why c...If time itself began at creation, there is no prior temporal framework to explai...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Leibniz's PSR requires that every contingent fact have a sufficient reason; the ...PSR itself may be unprovable or false; rejecting it avoids the problem entirely ...Temporal eliminativism (denying objective time) cannot ground why physical laws ...