Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The private/political distinction Derrida invokes is itse... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Derrida's demand for linguistic purity is not ethical, political, or social in character.

    The private/political distinction Derrida invokes is itself deconstructed in his political writings, undermining any sharp separation between idiomatic law and social normativity.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Derrida's writings on justice, sovereignty, and hospitality show how supposedly private decisions (pardons, asylum) are always already shaped by public law and vice versa.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The concept of the 'undecidable' reveals that pure idiomatic particularity cannot exist independently—every singular decision involves iteration of general norms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Derrida's analysis of hauntology and spectral forces demonstrates how private and public temporalities interpenetrate, making their separation theoretically untenable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Derrida explicitly preserves a distinction between calculable law and incalculable justice, which requires some space for idiomatic autonomy irreducible to normativity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Showing that boundaries are blurred differs from showing they are entirely deconstructed—Derrida may critique sharp separations without eliminating meaningful distinctions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates Derrida's descriptive analysis (how private/political overlap) with prescriptive deconstruction (that the distinction collapses entirely).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Derrida explicitly preserves a distinction between calculable law and incalculab...Derrida's analysis of hauntology and spectral forces demonstrates how private an...Derrida's demand for linguistic purity is not ethical, political, or social in c...Derrida's writings on justice, sovereignty, and hospitality show how supposedly ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Showing that boundaries are blurred differs from showing they are entirely decon...The claim conflates Derrida's descriptive analysis (how private/political overla...The concept of the 'undecidable' reveals that pure idiomatic particularity canno...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit