Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The proposed counterexample to the thesis that no instance of RI is true fails.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If 'A' and 'B' refer to the same objects throughout (1), then the first conjunct of (1) is not an identity statement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If both conjuncts of (1) are identity statements in the required sense, then 'A' and 'B' must refer to word types in the first conjunct and word tokens in the second.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.In either disjunctive case, the counterexample fails.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42