The pseudo-Epicharmus corpus, which contains explicitly Pythagorean content, was identified by Wilamowitz and subsequent scholars as later forgeries designed to claim Pythagorean priority for Platonic ideas.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Pseudo-Epicharmus corpus(as a historical/textual concept)
A collection of writings falsely claimed to be written by Epicharmus, but actually created later by someone else trying to appear more ancient and authoritative.
Pythagorean(Used to assess whether Alcmaeon's philosophical affiliation aligns with the Pythagorean tradition)
A philosopher belonging to or directly associated with the Pythagorean school, characterized by doctrines including the opposition between limit and unlimited as foundational principles
Wilamowitz(as a historical scholar)
A famous German classical scholar from the late 1800s and early 1900s who studied ancient Greek texts and figured out which ones were fakes.