Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The PSR, applied universally, demands a sufficient reason for God's own existence, generating an infinite regress or an arbitrary stopping point.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
PSR may be epistemically justified for contingent beings without applying to necessary beings like God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A necessary being requires no external sufficient reason because its existence is metaphysically self-explanatory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The argument equivocates between 'explaining existence' and 'causal explanation,' conflating distinct concepts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If PSR is true universally, it applies to all existing things without exception, including God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Either God has a sufficient reason for existence (external cause) or God is self-caused or brute fact.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
All three options (external cause, self-causation, brute fact) violate PSR's demands or generate logical problems.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.