Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The pull our own decisions have on our ongoing projects c... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Our normative commitments arise from how we must view ourselves as having capacities for reflection and choice, not from our actual capacities to reflect and choose.

    The pull our own decisions have on our ongoing projects can only be explained by assuming we confer status and value on decisions simply because we reflectively made them.

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Our normative commitments arise from how we must view ourselves as having capaci...This capacity for reflective self-authorship is all-or-nothing rather than a mat...We give special weight to our own present and past decisions, continuing project...

    Similar

    We give special weight to our own present and past decisions, continui...84%Normative reasoning (e.g., reflective equilibrium) can yield conclusio...76%An agent can be ultimately responsible for a causally determined decis...73%To avoid those difficulties, the value of autonomy must be grounded in...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: autonomy-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    The answer may be that our normative commitments do not arise from our actual capacities to reflect and to choose (though we must have such capacities to some minimal degree), but rather from the way in which we must view ourselves as having these capacities. We give special weight to our own present and past decisions, so that we continue on with projects and plans we make because (all other things being equal) we made them, they are ours, at least when we do them after some reflective delibera

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective