Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Quakers' divine light is divisible into measures and ... — Carmelics
    Home/Proof of definition segments
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Quakers' divine light is material, not spiritual.

    The Quakers' divine light is divisible into measures and portions.

    Against an aspect of GodProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Proof of definition segmentsAgainst an aspect of God

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Proof of definition segments
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Divisibility and motion cannot agree with a spiritual substance strictly so call...The Quakers describe their divine light as a 'Vehiculum Dei'.The Quakers' divine light is material, not spiritual.

    Similar

    The Quakers' divine light is a creature and therefore contingent.82%The Quakers' divine light is material, not spiritual.79%The Quakers' divine light is a creature, not God.79%The Quakers describe their divine light as a 'Vehiculum Dei'.77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: john-norris
    View source passageHide passage
    Norris was familiar with Roger Barclay and George Keith's expositions of Quakerism, and argued against the view in Reflections upon the Conduct of Human Life. The Quakers had an affinity for the ideal philosophy because they believed the divine light that enlightens the human mind supported their view. Norris delineates the many differences between Quaker thought and his own, but perhaps the main difference is: “The Quakers represent this light within as a sort of Extraordinary Inspiration (when

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective