Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The reciprocal 1/a of an infinite hyperreal a exceeds 0 a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→An infinitesimal hyperreal exists

    The reciprocal 1/a of an infinite hyperreal a exceeds 0 and is smaller than 1/(n+1) for every natural number n

    Modality & PossibilityProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityProof of definition segments

    Related

    An infinite hyperreal a exists such that a > n for every natural number nAn infinitesimal hyperreal exists

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Any hyperreal whose absolute value is less than 1/(n+1) for every natu...87%An infinite hyperreal a exists such that a > n for every natural numbe...84%An infinite (nonstandard) hyperreal exists78%Nonstandard infinitesimal hyperreals exist in substantial number77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: continuity
    View source passageHide passage
    Now suppose that the set \(\bbN\) of natural numbers is a member of \(U\). Then so is the set \(\Re\) of real numbers, since each real number may be identified with a set of natural numbers. \(\Re\) may be regarded as an ordered field, and the same is therefore true of its inflate \(\hat{\Re}\), since the latter has precisely the same first-order properties as \(\Re\). \(\hat{\Re}\) is called the hyperreal line, and its members hyperreals. A standard hyperreal is then just a real, to which we sh

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective