Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The reference of a proper name is the object itself — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The sense of a proper name is objective, not merely subjective like an idea, yet is distinct from the reference (the object itself)

    The reference of a proper name is the object itself

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linkedPerception2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    The idea associated with a proper name is wholly subjectiveThe optical image in a telescope is one-sided and standpoint-dependent, yet is o...The sense of a proper name is objective, not merely subjective like an idea, yet...The sense of a proper name occupies the intermediate position analogous to the t...

    Similar

    The Millian-Russellian holds that the content of a proper name is the ...87%The sense of a proper name is objective, not merely subjective like an...86%Mastery of proper names does not require associating a reference-deter...83%The relation between a proper name and its referent is merely linguist...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: meaning
    View source passageHide passage
    The reference of a proper name is the object itself which we designate by its means; the idea, which we have in that case, is wholly subjective; in between lies the sense, which is indeed no longer subjective like the idea, but is yet not the object itself. The following analogy will perhaps clarify these relationships. Somebody observes the Moon through a telescope. I compare the Moon itself to the reference; it is the object of the observation, mediated by the real image projected by the objec

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective