Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The rejection of aesthetic experience as a goal is a fund... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Attacking conceptual art for lacking aesthetic experience targets the artistic tradition itself, not any individual work.

    The rejection of aesthetic experience as a goal is a fundamental feature of conceptual art as a tradition.

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    A critique directed at a fundamental feature of an artistic tradition is a criti...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Attacking conceptual art for lacking aesthetic experience targets the artistic t...

    Similar

    Attacking conceptual art for lacking aesthetic experience targets the ...89%Criticizing conceptual art for failing to yield aesthetic experiences ...88%It is possible to hold that conceptual art does not qualify as good ar...86%If art is defined in terms of aesthetic experience, then conceptual ar...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: conceptual-art
    View source passageHide passage
    Now, even if it is granted that art need not be aesthetic, it is still possible to hold that conceptual art does not qualify as good art because it does not (aim to) yield aesthetic experiences. But while this may be a viable position to hold in relation to the project of conceptual art in general, it cannot be used to attack conceptual art on its own grounds. Saying, for example, of Michael Craig-Martin’s An Oak Tree that one cannot consider it a great work of art because it fails to give rise

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective