Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The relationship between BQP and NP is currently not well... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Even a proof that P is a strict subset of BQP would not by itself settle the bearing of quantum computation on feasible computation or the Cobham-Edmonds thesis

    The relationship between BQP and NP is currently not well understood

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Even a proof that P is a strict subset of BQP would not by itself settle the bea...No polynomial-time quantum algorithms have been found for NP-complete problems o...Whether physically robust realizations of quantum computation models sufficient ...

    Similar

    Readers of Timaeus must seek a connection between Timaeus and Republic...86%Resemblance is a relation.85%The connections between Information-B (Shannon) and Information-C (Kol...85%Not-Q8* provides a potential explanation of E881%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    \(\textbf{BPP}\) can now be defined to include the problems \(X\) such that there exists a probabilistic Turing machine \(C \in \mathfrak{C}\) and a constant \(\frac{1}{2} \lt p \leq 1\) with the following properties: \(C\) runs in polynomial time for all inputs; for all inputs \(x \in X\), at least fraction \(p\) of the possible computations of \(C\) on \(x\) accept; for all inputs \(x \not\in X\), at least fraction \(p\) of the possible computations of \(C\) on \(x\) reject. e. with probab

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective