Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The remedial right only approach does not grant nations a unilateral right to secede independently of persisting grave injustices.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Plebiscitary theorists like Harry Beran argue that a sufficiently large, territorially concentrated group has a right to secede based solely on collective democratic will.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If democratic self-determination is foundational to legitimate governance, then requiring prior injustice as a precondition subordinates democratic autonomy to the state's prior conduct.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A theory that denies secession rights to groups suffering no injustice but genuinely preferring self-governance privileges state integrity over democratic consent without principled justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Nationalist theorists like David Miller hold that nations possess pre-political identities grounding special obligations and entitlements, including self-governance, independent of whether states have wronged them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If national identity constitutes a morally significant form of collective agency, then conditioning its political expression on demonstrated victimhood mischaracterizes the normative basis of national self-determination entirely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The remedial right only approach ties the right to secede to patterns of grave injustices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Nations as such, absent such injustices, are not granted unilateral secession rights under this approach.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.