Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The representational capacities of propositions must derive from and be explained by the representational capacities of thinking agents
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Fregean senses and Platonic propositions possess determinate truth-conditions as abstract objects, independent of any mind's representational acts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If abstract objects can instantiate mathematical structure without minds, they can instantiate representational structure without minds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The supporting argument equivocates: that propositions lack *intrinsic* representation does not entail representation must derive from *thinking agents* specifically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Semantic externalism (Putnam, Burge) establishes that representational content is fixed by mind-independent environmental and social facts, not solely by agents' mental capacities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Propositions represent the world as being a certain way
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The representational capacities of propositions cannot be something propositions have inherently and by their natures
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42