Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting the goo... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting the good of any individual

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Claims of right are grounded in people's interests in gaining the assistance and cooperation of others, and in protection against others' encroachments
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.These grounds involve multiple competing individuals rather than any single individual's good
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Related

    Claims of right are grounded in people's interests in gaining the assistance and...These grounds involve multiple competing individuals rather than any single indi...

    Similar

    The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting the good96%The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting some independent con...93%Any right of a person implies a restriction for others, independently ...82%We do not ascribe rights to people merely because it would be good if ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: dewey-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Pragmatism in ethics is often regarded as a form of teleology or consequentialism. Yet Dewey rejected accounts of the right that defined it in terms of promoting the good (E 214–216). The concept of the right contains an element not contained in the good — namely, that of an authoritative demand. The phenomenology of claims of good and right are also distinct: the good attracts or appeals, whereas claims of right appear to command authority. The demands of the right often conflict with individua
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit