Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The row player's bottom action is not best under any poss... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Strong rationality is a more demanding condition than weak rationality.

    The row player's bottom action is not best under any possible circumstance, which contradicts strong rationality but not weak rationality.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    The row player's bottom action is eliminated under strong rationality but not un...

    Related

    In the given game matrix, announcing weak rationality stops after the first step...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Strong rationality implies weak rationality, but there can be moves that satisfy...
    Strong rationality is a more demanding condition than weak rationality.
    The row player's bottom action is eliminated under strong rationality but not un...

    Similar

    The row player's bottom action is not strictly dominated by any other ...97%The row player's bottom action is eliminated under strong rationality ...96%The row player's bottom action is never best for the row player under ...91%A rational player would never play a dominated action, since action b ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logics-for-games
    View source passageHide passage
    Strong rationality is a more demanding condition than weak rationality. While SR implies WR, there can be moves that satisfy weak but not strong rationality. This shows in the following difference between the current and the previous example. In the present matrix, announcing Weak Rationality stops after the first step elimination of action c. The reason is that, in the second matrix, the row player’s bottom move is not strictly dominated by any other action, so this row remains after re-announc

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective