Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The scope restriction on Mill's principles makes sense on... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Basic liberties have value only when necessary conditions for the exercise of deliberative capacities are in place

    The scope restriction on Mill's principles makes sense only if basic liberties are instrumentally rather than intrinsically valuable

    ConsequentialismRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyConsequentialism

    Connections

    2 topics

    Moral Responsibility2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Virtue Ethics
    1 linked

    Related

    Basic liberties have value only when necessary conditions for the exercise of de...Mill's liberal principles do not apply to individuals who lack suitably develope...Sufficient rational development or normative competence is a necessary condition...

    Similar

    Rawls provides no argument for why FEO should receive less priority th...81%Mill's harm principle holds that liberty may only be restricted to pre...79%The harm principle is not necessary to justify restrictions on liberty79%The restrictions in question do not restrict fundamental liberties suc...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Third, it is important to be clear about how Mill values basic liberties. To account for the robust character of his perfectionist argument, it is tempting to suppose that Mill thinks these basic liberties are themselves important intrinsic goods (see Berger 1984: 41, 50, 199, 231–32; Bogen and Farrell 1978: 325–28). But in Mill’s introductory remarks he insists that his liberal principles do not apply to individuals who do not have a suitably developed normative competence (I 10). So, for insta

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective