Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The self-transforming flow of consciousness reflects both intentional coherence and semantic self-understanding.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Hume's bundle theory demonstrates that introspection reveals only discrete perceptions, never a unified self-organizing semantic agent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without a persistent subject, 'self-understanding' is a grammatical fiction projected onto discontinuous mental events.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Intentional coherence across time requires a substrate that bundle-theoretic accounts of mind structurally cannot supply.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Metzinger's no-self model shows that phenomenal selfhood is a transparent representational construct, not genuine semantic self-knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A system modeling itself as a semantic agent is epistemically distinct from actually possessing semantic self-understanding of that modeling.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Conscious minds continually remake themselves as autopoietic systems engaged with their worlds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
This self-remaking is organized through controls that embody semantic self-understanding.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The flow of consciousness is directed toward intentional objects, giving it intentional coherence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42