Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The space of possible divine reasons for permitting evil is plausibly infinite and lacks a natural partition, making any equiprobability assignment arbitrary.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Practical reasoning routinely assigns probabilities in infinite spaces (e.g., physics) without requiring exhaustive enumeration or natural partitions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim conflates epistemic difficulty with logical arbitrariness; genuine ignorance doesn't entail that all assignments are equally unjustified.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Structural constraints—theodicy must explain actual evil's patterns—do provide natural partitions even if the full space is infinite.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Divine reasons span infinite logical space: soul-making, greater goods, free will, divine self-limitation, and countless unforeseen purposes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without natural boundaries, any finite partition of reasons appears stipulated rather than discovered, making equiprobability unmotivated.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We lack independent access to divine cognition, so we cannot justify weighting some reasons over others non-arbitrarily.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.