Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The standard free will defense works only by diminishing ... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The standard free will defense is not available to the theological determinist.

    The standard free will defense works only by diminishing God's authority and circumscribing his providence.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine Attributes

    Related

    The standard free will defense is not available to the theological determinist.Theological determinism does not allow for diminishing God's authority or circum...

    Similar

    The free will defense does not provide a complete solution to the prob...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    86%
    The free will defense deals only with moral evil.85%
    This approach does not endanger God's sovereignty or omniscience, unli...84%
    Even if the free will defense succeeds, there remains a residuum of na...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: providence-divine
    View source passageHide passage
    If the author of sin objection does not succeed in defeating the traditional view, then what is left is the question of whether God has sufficiently good reason for decreeing the evil that exists. The standard free will defense, which works only by diminishing God’s authority and circumscribing his providence, is not available to the theological determinist. Can the theist’s response to the argument from evil survive the loss of the standard free will defense?

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective