Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The state requires subjects to obey the law. — Carmelics
    Home/Social Contract
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The state and the egoistic individual are necessarily in conflict.

    The state requires subjects to obey the law.

    Social Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Social Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty3 linked

    Related

    Self-rule (autonomy) is incompatible with any obligation to obey the law.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Social Contract
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Self-rule is valued more highly than any obligation to obey the law.
    The state and the egoistic individual are necessarily in conflict.

    Similar

    The state compels obedience to its commands and affirms that these com...82%In civil society, citizens obey laws they have prescribed to themselve...77%The law must apply to everyone within the state76%A law must be binding on humans, since there is a duty of compliance o...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: max-stirner
    View source passageHide passage
    On Stirner’s account, there is a necessary antipathy between the egoistic individual and the state. This inevitable hostility is based on the conflict between Stirner’s conception of autonomy and any obligation to obey the law. “Own will and the state”, he writes, “are powers in deadly hostility, between which no ‘perpetual peace’ is possible” (175). Since self-rule is incompatible with, and valued more highly than, any obligation to obey the law, Stirner rejects the legitimacy of political obli

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective