Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The Stoic claim that wisdom alone suffices for happiness entails that the sage on the rack is happy, which conflicts with deeply held and revisable moral intuitions.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Happiness as a concept has historically tracked subjective well-being; redefining it to exclude suffering strains the term beyond linguistic recognition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If Stoicism must dismiss nearly universal human judgments about suffering as confused to preserve its thesis, this suggests the theory conflicts with bedrock reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The sage's rational acceptance of torture doesn't entail torture causes no harm; endorsing a harmful thing rationally doesn't negate its harms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral intuitions about happiness often conflate it with pleasure or comfort, which Stoics deliberately reject as philosophically confused.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If wisdom consists in perfect rational understanding of virtue's value, physical torment cannot rationally diminish the sage's grasp of what truly matters.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Revisability of intuitions suggests they warrant skepticism; perhaps our discomfort with 'happy sage on rack' reveals intuitions need correction, not the theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.