Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Stoic conflation of psychological disposition with ac... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A proper function becomes a fully correct action (katorthôma) only when it is done virtuously.

    The Stoic conflation of psychological disposition with action-correctness smuggles agent-evaluation into act-evaluation without independent justification.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Action-correctness requires evaluating consequences and circumstances independent of the agent's internal state or virtue.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Stoics define right action solely by virtue/correct disposition, collapsing the distinct category of external action-evaluation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without independent criteria for acts, Stoicism cannot explain why two agents with identical dispositions might face different moral duties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Stoics explicitly distinguish between preferred indifferents (externals) and virtue, so they don't actually conflate disposition with action-correctness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim assumes act-evaluation must be independent from agent-evaluation, but this unity may be philosophically justified, not smuggled.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Stoic theory explains action-correctness through reason's assessment of what fits one's role and circumstances—a principled framework, not mere circularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    A proper function becomes a fully correct action (katorthôma) only when it is do...Action-correctness requires evaluating consequences and circumstances independen...Stoic theory explains action-correctness through reason's assessment of what fit...Stoics define right action solely by virtue/correct disposition, collapsing the ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Stoics explicitly distinguish between preferred indifferents (externals) and vir...The claim assumes act-evaluation must be independent from agent-evaluation, but ...Without independent criteria for acts, Stoicism cannot explain why two agents wi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit