Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The Stoics held that sound-mindedness (sophrosyne) is an epistemic disposition—correct judgment about what is truly choiceworthy—not a behavioral disposition.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Sophrosyne in earlier Greek tradition emphasizes self-restraint and moderation in action, not merely correct judgment about value.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Someone can correctly judge what is choiceworthy yet fail to exhibit the habitually temperate behavior associated with sophrosyne.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The Stoic account cannot explain weakness of will—how someone with correct judgment might still act incontinently or fail to self-regulate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The Stoics identified virtue with knowledge of good and evil, making all virtues ultimately cognitive rather than merely behavioral.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Correct judgment about value automatically produces appropriate action in Stoic psychology—behavior follows necessarily from true belief.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Sophrosyne involves discerning what truly merits desire versus what merely appears desirable, a fundamentally epistemic task of evaluation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.