Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

The study of living things requires emphasizing form, tel... — Carmelics

Home/Perception

History Edit See Inverse

The study of living things requires emphasizing form, teleological explanation, and conditional necessity.

Causation Perception

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

2 reasons against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

?

1.Aristotle develops his view by exposing errors of prior natural investigators such as Empedocles and Democritus.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.What initially appears as three separate narratives constitutes a single complex case for these three emphases.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.Form in living things is soul, which is causally prior to matter as its goal.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reasons Against

2 perspectives

Reason against 1 of 2

?

1.Mechanistic explanation in biology (Descartes, contemporary molecular biology) successfully explains living processes without invoking teleological causes.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.If teleology can be fully reduced to efficient-causal chains selected by evolution, Aristotle's irreducible teleological framework is explanatorily redundant.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.Darwin's natural selection provides a naturalistic account of apparent design, undermining the claim that form and telos are explanatorily indispensable.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reason against 2 of 2

?

1.Conditional necessity, as Aristotle deploys it, presupposes that ends are fixed, but developmental plasticity shows biological form is highly context-dependent.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.If form in living things is causally prior as soul, this commits Aristotle to a hylomorphic dualism that modern physicalism renders incoherent as an explanatory framework.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Strongest counterpoint

Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

Topics

Perception Causation

Notable Defenders

AristotleancientPosterior Analytics, chs. 16-17

AristotleancientPosterior Analytics (APo.) I 10

Aristotleancient

AristotleancientPosterior Analytics (implied context of causal demonstration and scientific definition)

Aristotleancient644b23–645a3

AristotleancientOn the Parts of Animals (PA) II-IV

AristotleancientParts of Animals 644b29–645a3

AristotleancientParts of Animals (PA) I 4, 639b1–5; Posterior Analytics (APo) I 4–5, II

Aristotleancient

AristotleancientPrior Analytics and Posterior Analytics (APr., APo.)

Aristotleancient

AristotleancientHistoria Animalium (HA)

AristotleancientParts of Animals I 5, 645a4–36

AristotleancientHistory of Animals I 6; Posterior Analytics; Parts of Animals; Generation of Animals

AristotleancientParts of Animals 642b13–19, 644b2–3; Posterior Analytics

AristotleancientHistoria Animalium

AristotleancientGeneration of Animals 735a13–14; Physics II.1

AristotleancientParts of Animals (De Partibus Animalium)

AristotleancientHistory of Animals 486b22–487a14

AristotleancientPosterior Analytics II, History of Animals, On the Parts of Animals, On the Generation of Animals

HeraclitusancientQuoted anecdotally: 'For there are gods here too'

Platoancient

Allan GotthelfcontemporaryGotthelf 1988, 1997b

David BalmecontemporaryBalme 1961, 1987b

James LennoxcontemporaryLennox 2001b, chs. 1, 2

Pierre PellegrincontemporaryPellegrin 1986

Connections

2 topics

Consciousness & Mind1 linked Philosophy of Language1 linked

Related

Aristotle develops his view by exposing errors of prior natural investigators su...Conditional necessity, as Aristotle deploys it, presupposes that ends are fixed,...

Source

AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid

SEP: aristotle-biology

View source passageHide passage

The argument is complicated in virtue of its manner of presentation. First, it is a narrative in which Aristotle gradually develops his own views by exposing the errors of those who investigated nature before him; it is structured as presenting an alternative to views expressed by Empedocles and Democritus, and as in the spirit of Socrates (642a24–31). Second, as is so typical of him, what initially may appear to be three separate narratives turn out to be a single, complex case for emphasizing

Extraction notes

Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

Details

Darwin's natural selection provides a naturalistic account of apparent design, u...

Form in living things is soul, which is causally prior to matter as its goal.

+4 moreShow less

If form in living things is causally prior as soul, this commits Aristotle to a ...If teleology can be fully reduced to efficient-causal chains selected by evoluti...Mechanistic explanation in biology (Descartes, contemporary molecular biology) s...What initially appears as three separate narratives constitutes a single complex...

Type: claim
Perspectives: 3 (1 for, 2 against)
Edits: 1 edit