Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The supporting argument's premise 3 therefore actually supports compatibilist freedom rather than undermining it, reversing the direction of the original claim.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Premise 3's support for compatibilism only works if compatibilism is already assumed true; it doesn't independently vindicate the position.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Showing that actions flow from internal states doesn't address whether those states themselves are ultimately determined by factors beyond control.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The direction-reversal claim simply reassigns premise 3 to a different conclusion without resolving the underlying metaphysical disagreement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Compatibilism requires that free actions flow from an agent's own desires, values, and reasoning—exactly what premise 3 describes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If premise 3 establishes that our choices arise from internal causal processes rather than external force, it vindicates compatibilist freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The original argument conflates 'determined by internal states' with 'unfree,' but compatibilists reject this conflation as the core error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.