The supporting argument's premise that undetermined factors must enter the reflexive content begs the question against minimalism by assuming rich context-dependence at the level of what is said.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Context-dependence(in philosophy of language): The idea that the meaning of something changes depending on the situation, who's speaking, when it's said, and other surrounding details.
Minimalism(one of the theoretical frameworks mentioned): A philosophical approach that tries to explain something using as few assumptions or principles as possible.
Premise: A premise is a statement or fact that you assume to be true as a starting point for reasoning or making an argument. Think of it as the foundation or building block you use to reach a conclusion—for example, "All dogs are animals" and "My pet is a dog" are premises that lead to the conclusion "My pet is an animal." Premises are essentially the evidence or claims you offer before drawing a final conclusion.
Reflexive content(as used in philosophy of mind and semantics): The meaning that a thought or statement has when it refers back to itself or depends on its own context.

Based on where you are in your exploration