Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The transcendental claim must be weakened in response to ... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Transcendental arguments need only make a modest claim about what we must believe, not about how things actually are

    The transcendental claim must be weakened in response to Stroud's objection

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A modest transcendental claim—concerning what we must believe rather than how th...Showing beliefs to be fundamental does not require establishing correspondence b...Transcendental arguments need only make a modest claim about what we must believ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Strawson's transcendental argument is susceptible to Stroud's line of ...86%Kant's transcendental argument was designed to answer Hume's skepticis...85%Stroud's objection to transcendental arguments is not limited to the s...84%The strongest defensible transcendental claims concern merely how thin...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transcendental-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    Now, whether or not this is the most charitable way of reading Strawson’s earlier position, he himself does not seem to have adopted quite this first response when he came to reply to Stroud in his later work. Rather, while he accepts Stroud’s insistence that the transcendental claim must be weakened (cf. Strawson 1985: 9), he then also offers what he call a naturalistic reply to the skeptic based on Hume and also on some Wittgensteinian ideas developed in On Certainty, according to which the ri

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective