Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The transformation behavior of ψ components is well-defin... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The metric at a point in general relativity must be described by local Cartesian axes e(a) rather than by the metric tensor g_pq when dealing with the electron wave field ψ.

    The transformation behavior of ψ components is well-defined only under transitions between Cartesian axes at a point, not under arbitrary coordinate transformations.

    Proof of definition segmentsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeProof of definition segments

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    General relativity ordinarily uses g_pq to describe the metric, but g_pq belongs...The metric at a point in general relativity must be described by local Cartesian...The wave field ψ has definite components ψ⁺₁, ψ⁺₂, ψ⁻₁, ψ⁻₂ relative to local Ca...

    Similar

    Because ψ does not transform under affine transformations, ψ component...80%Pauli and Dirac recognized that ψ is not a scalar but a magnitude with...73%The wave field ψ has definite components ψ⁺₁, ψ⁺₂, ψ⁻₁, ψ⁻₂ relative t...72%Spacetime coordinates are not invariant under coordinate transformatio...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: weyl
    View source passageHide passage
    The tensor calculus is not the proper mathematical instrument to use in translating the quantum-theoretic equations of the electron over into the general theory of relativity. Vectors and terms [tensors] are so constituted that the law which defines the transformation of their components from one Cartesian set of axes to another can be extended to the most general linear transformation, to an affine set of axes. That is not the case for quantity \(\psi\), however; this kind of quantity bel

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective