Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The truthmaker account of ontological commitment has a pr... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The truthmaker account of ontological commitment has a problem with capturing implicit ontological commitment.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The truthmaker account identifies ontological commitments with entities whose existence is sufficient for the truth of the theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Implicit ontological commitments are not captured by sufficiency conditions alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The quantifier account also fails to capture implicit commitment, though for a different reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Implicit ontological commitments are not captured by sufficiency conditions alon...The quantifier account also fails to capture implicit commitment, though for a d...The truthmaker account identifies ontological commitments with entities whose ex...

    Similar

    The truthmaker account of ontological commitment undergenerates commit...92%Quantifier accounts of ontological commitment fail to capture implicit...92%Entailment accounts of ontological commitment handle implicit ontologi...90%Quantifier accounts of ontological commitment cannot correctly capture...88%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: ontological-commitment
    View source passageHide passage
    The truthmaker account of ontological commitment—like the quantifier account, but for an entirely different reason—has a problem with capturing implicit commitment. The problem arises because the truthmakers for a theory, but not the ontological commitments of a theory, are entities whose existence is sufficient for the truth of the theory. The problem afflicts both the truthmaker criterion for particulars, and for kinds. Indeed, assuming truthmaker necessitarianism, it follows from the former c
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit