Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The unique Nash equilibrium is the only outcome surviving... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If a game has a unique Nash equilibrium outcome, that outcome must be the game's unique solution.

    The unique Nash equilibrium is the only outcome surviving elimination of strictly dominated strategies.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    2 linked

    Related

    A player who knowingly chooses a strictly dominated strategy violates the defini...Avoidance of strictly dominated strategies is a minimum requirement of economic ...If a game has a unique Nash equilibrium outcome, that outcome must be the game's...

    Similar

    If iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies leads to a u...91%Iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies removes all str...87%If a game has a unique Nash equilibrium outcome, that outcome must be ...86%No strategy can be a Nash equilibrium strategy if it is strictly domin...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: game-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    It’s useful to start the discussion here from the case of the Prisoner’s Dilemma because it’s unusually simple from the perspective of the puzzles about solution concepts. What we referred to as its ‘solution’ is the unique Nash equilibrium of the game. (The ‘Nash’ here refers to John Nash, the Nobel Laureate mathematician who in Nash (1950) did most to extend and generalize von Neumann & Morgenstern’s pioneering work.) Nash equilibrium (henceforth ‘NE’) applies (or fails to apply, as the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective