Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The universe has a cause of its existence.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The causal principle 'everything that begins to exist has a cause' is an empirical generalization derived solely from experience of intra-universal events.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Empirical generalizations derived exclusively from experience within a domain cannot be reliably extrapolated to the origin of that domain itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore the causal premise lacks the warrant needed to apply it to the universe's own coming-into-existence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Quantum field theory permits vacuum fluctuations producing particle pairs without any prior efficient cause, suggesting uncaused beginnings are physically coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If uncaused physical beginnings are coherent at the quantum level, the claim that all beginnings require causes is not a necessary metaphysical truth but at best a contingent regularity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A merely contingent regularity is insufficient to ground the universal causal premise required by the kalām argument.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.If something has a finite past, its existence has a cause.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The universe has a finite past.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The universe began to exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.