Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Vajradhvaja Sūtra passage refers to the dedication of... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Vajradhvaja Sūtra passage refers to the dedication of the virtuous actions (karma) of all beings, not the dedication of the Dharmadhātu.

    Philosophy of LanguageProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The Vajradhvaja Sūtra passage cannot refer to the Dharmadhātu, since the Dharmadhātu is beyond number and beyond existence/non-existence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The passage must refer to something within conventional, changing, illusory reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The virtuous actions (karma) of beings belong to conventional, changing, illusory reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.In Yogācāra-Madhyamaka synthesis, the Dharmadhātu functions as the ground of merit-dedication, not merely its object, collapsing the distinction the claim presupposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Nāgārjuna's Dharmadhātustava treats the Dharmadhātu as immanent within conventional karmic activity, making it a coherent referent for dedication passages.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The Vajradhvaja Sūtra's own framing of 'as many beings as exist' employs the exhaustive totality characteristic of Dharmadhātu descriptions, not merely karmic enumeration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Mipham Rinpoche and the Rimé commentators argue that conflating the dedicating subject with virtuous karma commits a category error that only Dharmadhātu-referent readings avoid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageProof of definition segments

    Connections

    3 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Dedicating whatever virtuous actions beings perform is coherent within conventio...In Yogācāra-Madhyamaka synthesis, the Dharmadhātu functions as the ground of mer...Mipham Rinpoche and the Rimé commentators argue that conflating the dedicating s...Nāgārjuna's Dharmadhātustava treats the Dharmadhātu as immanent within conventio...
    +4 moreShow less
    The Vajradhvaja Sūtra passage cannot refer to the Dharmadhātu, since the Dharmad...The Vajradhvaja Sūtra's own framing of 'as many beings as exist' employs the exh...

    Similar

    Locke's Essay passage cited by the opponent concerns nominal essence, ...76%The Vajradhvaja Sūtra passage cannot refer to the Dharmadhātu, since t...76%The virtuous actions (karma) of beings belong to conventional, changin...75%The opponent's argument against Locke fails because it misattributes a...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: sakya-pandita
    View source passageHide passage
    Sapaṇ begins the argument by quoting a wide range of authoritative sources to show that the “Sugata-matrix” is unchanging, that it is equivalent to the Dharmadhātu and the Tathāgata-nature, and that these are all completely devoid of evil and virtue, which are illusory constructions.[16] Near the end of the passage Sapaṇ recommends that the reader study, in particular, the Dharmodgata chapter of the Perfection of Wisdom in 8,000 Lines (I.137; Rhoton 2002: 58). That chapter teaches that suchnes
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    The passage must refer to something within conventional, changing, illusory real...
    The virtuous actions (karma) of beings belong to conventional, changing, illusor...
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit