Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The very idea of synthetic a priori judgments is a contradiction in terms.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kantian intuition is inductive and only yields concepts, never propositions
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Axioms and propositions are analytic judgments constructed deductively from concepts
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Meaning is exhausted by verification conditions, so any genuinely informative judgment must be empirically testable (Ayer, Language Truth and Logic).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Judgments that are necessarily true independent of experience cannot add factual content, making 'synthetic a priori' a category that satisfies neither condition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Quine's indeterminacy of translation shows no principled boundary between analytic and synthetic judgments exists, dissolving the distinction Kant's framework requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without a stable analytic/synthetic distinction, 'synthetic a priori' collapses: apparent cases like '7+5=12' are either revisable empirical posits or disguised analytic truths.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42