Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The weak sense of causal sufficiency (where other necessa... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Theistic intuitions support the claim that God's creative volitions are necessarily a causally sufficient condition (in the weak sense) of the existence of every other concrete object.

    The weak sense of causal sufficiency (where other necessary conditions may also be required) is compatible with theistic intuitions.

    CausationDivine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesCausation

    Related

    Theistic intuitions clearly support the necessity of God's creative volitions as...Theistic intuitions support the claim that God's creative volitions are necessar...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If 'causally sufficient condition' is taken in the strong sense, a cau...84%This assumption holds only if 'causally sufficient condition' is taken...83%Theistic intuitions do not clearly support the claim that God's creati...81%Theistic intuitions support the claim that God's creative volitions ar...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: monotheism
    View source passageHide passage
    The problem with Scotus’s argument, then, is this. The inferences from 4 to 5, and from 6 to 7, are valid only upon the assumption that if a cause is sufficient to produce an effect no other cause is a necessary condition of that effect. But this is true only if a causally sufficient condition is such that it alone suffices to produce its effect, that is, if it is causally sufficient in the strong sense. If “causally sufficient condition” is taken in the strong sense, however, there are reasons

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective