Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The word 'exists' is ambiguous between different senses c... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The word 'exists' is ambiguous between different senses corresponding to different ontological categories

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.It would be a poor joke to say 'three things are rising: the tide, hopes, and the average age of death', because 'rising' has different senses in each context
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Similarly, saying 'there exist both prime numbers and bodies' mixes ontological categories under a single word
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The conjunction reduction test reveals that combining such uses sounds absurd, indicating distinct senses
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Frege and Russell established that 'exists' functions as a second-order predicate uniformly across all domains, expressing that a concept has instances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Quine's criterion of ontological commitment treats 'there exists' as a single logical operator (the existential quantifier) that ranges over all entities without categorical restriction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If 'exists' had distinct senses per category, existential quantification in formal logic would be systematically equivocal, yet it demonstrably preserves valid inference across mixed-domain statements.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The conjunction reduction test proves semantic difference only when predicates contribute distinct truth conditions, but categorial oddness can arise from pragmatic or sortal violations rather than lexical ambiguity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ryle's own category mistakes in 'The Concept of Mind' are explicable as violations of sortal presuppositions without positing ambiguity in the verbs involved, showing the inference from absurdity to ambiguity is invalid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Zeugma-based arguments conflate context-sensitive modulation of a univocal term with genuine polysemy, a distinction Recanati and others have shown is empirically and theoretically significant.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Related

    Frege and Russell established that 'exists' functions as a second-order predicat...If 'exists' had distinct senses per category, existential quantification in form...It would be a poor joke to say 'three things are rising: the tide, hopes, and th...Quine's criterion of ontological commitment treats 'there exists' as a single lo...
    +5 moreShow less
    Ryle's own category mistakes in 'The Concept of Mind' are explicable as violatio...Similarly, saying 'there exist both prime numbers and bodies' mixes ontological ...The conjunction reduction test proves semantic difference only when predicates c...The conjunction reduction test reveals that combining such uses sounds absurd, i...Zeugma-based arguments conflate context-sensitive modulation of a univocal term ...

    Similar

    The word 'exist' is not ambiguous despite having been claimed to be88%The phrase 'exists' attributes existence to the Dharmadhātu.86%On the standard meaning of 'exist', any object that has any being at a...85%Propositions such as 'Mind exists' or 'Matter exists' assert the exist...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: ambiguity
    View source passageHide passage
    Since the passing of the non-literal into the standardized literal is not exactly a transition whose time of occurrence is obvious, it will be difficult in some cases to tell what has been lexicalized as a different meaning and what has not (think, again, of ‘deadline’ as a case, which once meant a line the crossing of which would result in your death. Think of that next time you are late with a paper…) 5. Philosophical Issues There are a few main philosophical issues involved in ambiguity. 1
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit