Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The world is created by a divine will — a superior power capable of bringing humans into existence, maintaining them, or destroying them
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Hume's Dialogues show that inferring a perfect divine will from observed effects commits an analogical fallacy: effects only license proportionate causes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The world's mixture of order and disorder warrants at most a finite, imperfect cause, not an omnipotent sustaining will.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Spinoza demonstrates that a self-causing substance need not be a personal will but can be an impersonal necessary nature (Deus sive Natura).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The argument's move from 'self-causing' to 'superior divine will' illicitly smuggles in personhood, which the logical structure of the proof does not establish.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Sensation indicates that a creative being must exist
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The creative being cannot be less perfect than human will
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The creative being cannot be human, because reflection reveals that humans are not self-causing
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Show 1 more premise
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.