Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Theism provides a better explanation of moral knowledge than non-theistic accounts
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Subjectivist theories such as expressivism can explain why humans make the ethical judgments they do, but only by emptying morality of objective authority
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Objectivist theories that treat morality as having objective authority cannot explain how humans came to reliably form true moral judgments without positing a guiding being such as God
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A satisfactory account of morality must explain both its objective authority and humans' capacity to make true moral judgments
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42