Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    There exist cases where a regularity between utterances o... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Regularities in meaning and belief are not sufficient to ground an analysis of meaning.

    There exist cases where a regularity between utterances of a sentence and agents' believing a proposition holds, yet the sentence does not express that proposition in the relevant group.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Key Terms

    Express (in philosophy)(contrasted with 'how it is labeled')
    To communicate or convey a specific meaning or idea. When we say words 'express' something, we mean that's what they mean or convey.
    proposition(Used in the context of a semantic theory sensitive to differences in subject matter.)
    The content expressed by a sentence, individuated at least in part by the subject matter of the sentence and the contents of its subsentential expressions.
    regularity(Violated in de Finetti's lottery when each ticket is assigned probability 0)
    The property of a probability function whereby every possible event (every non-empty set of outcomes) receives positive probability

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    semantics(Distinguished from metasemantics and pragmatics in Kaplan 1989)
    The domain that concerns the facts about what meanings words or phrases have.
    utterance(Contrast drawn in discussing the referent of demonstrative 'that')
    A concrete event (an utterance-token), as opposed to an abstract utterance-type.

    Related

    A sufficient analysis of meaning must account for all cases where meaning is pre...Regularities in meaning and belief are not sufficient to ground an analysis of m...

    Similar

    For a sentence S to express a proposition p in some group, there must ...83%When agents fail to recognize a necessarily true proposition or that t...81%Bare regularities between utterances and belief states are insufficien...80%A sentence S expresses the proposition p if and only if three conditio...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: meaning
    View source passageHide passage
    Because of cases like this, it seems that regularities in meaning and belief are not sufficient to ground an analysis of meaning. For this reason, many proponents of a mentalist analysis of meaning in terms of belief have sought instead to analyze meaning in terms of conventions governing such regularities. Roughly, a regularity is a matter of convention when the regularity obtains because there is something akin to an agreement among a group of people to keep the regularity in place. So, applie

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective