Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There exists a hypothesis that is logically incompatible ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Problem of Evil
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Theism is more likely to be false than to be true.

    There exists a hypothesis that is logically incompatible with theism.

    Problem of Evil
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Problem of Evil

    Related

    Given facts about undesirable states of affairs in the world, that hypothesis is...If a hypothesis incompatible with theism is more probable than theism, then thei...Theism is more likely to be false than to be true.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Problem of Evil
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If there is some alternative hypothesis that is logically incompatible...93%If a hypothesis incompatible with theism is more probable than theism,...90%Therefore, it is not obvious that HI is logically incompatible with th...88%The indirect inductive approach argues that there is such an alternati...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: evil
    View source passageHide passage
    The argument from evil focuses upon the fact that the world appears to contain states of affairs that are bad, or undesirable, or that should have been prevented by any being that could have done so, and it asks how the existence of such states of affairs is to be squared with the existence of God. But the argument can be formulated in two very different ways. First, it can be formulated as a purely deductive argument that attempts to show that there are certain facts about the evil in the world that are logically incompatible with the existence of God. One especially ambitious form of this...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective