Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    There is a presumption in favor of equality of condition — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→It is not wrong to redistribute goods in a more egalitarian way that eliminates many advantages and disadvantages

    There is a presumption in favor of equality of condition

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Related

    By the Control Principle, one is not responsible for advantages and disadvantage...If one does not deserve certain advantages and disadvantages, then it is not wro...If one is not responsible for certain advantages and disadvantages, then one doe...It is not wrong to redistribute goods in a more egalitarian way that eliminates ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    +2 moreShow less
    One's natural talents, circumstances of birth, and similar factors are beyond on...These factors often give rise to advantages and disadvantages relative to others

    Similar

    Humanity is an unconditional value that is the condition of the possib...75%The presumption is always against those who make positive moral claims...75%There is a weighty moral duty to proportion one's beliefs to the evide...74%Synderesis is best characterized as a dispositional potentiality, not ...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-luck
    View source passageHide passage
    The “negative” luck argument for egalitarianism is really a rebuttal to the objection that people should not be deprived in the name of egalitarianism of what they have earned. The argument goes like this: Take as a starting point a presumption in favor of equality of condition. Next observe, as before, that one’s natural talents, circumstances of birth, and so on are things beyond one’s control, and, again, that these factors often give rise to advantages and disadvantages relative to others. T

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective