Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There is as yet no reliable evidence that the voluntary p... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Prohibiting the voluntary private consumption of pornography is not legitimately justified.

    There is as yet no reliable evidence that the voluntary private production or consumption of pornography by consenting adults causes sufficiently significant harm to others.

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & Liberty

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    A legitimate case for prohibition requires reliable evidence that pornography ca...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Pornography therefore satisfies only harmless personal preferences for sexual gr...
    Prohibiting the voluntary private consumption of pornography is not legitimately...

    Similar

    A legitimate case for prohibition requires reliable evidence that porn...87%Prohibiting the voluntary private consumption of pornography is not le...86%Public education campaigns warning consumers about the potential harms...78%Censorship of pornography on the grounds that consuming pornography is...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pornography-censorship
    View source passageHide passage
    Liberal defenders of the right to pornography may thus allow that restrictions on its public display may be justified. But only if pornography can reliably be shown to cause significant harm to people other than those consenting adults involved in its production and consumption will there be a legitimate case for prohibiting its voluntary private consumption. When an individual’s private activities cause harm to others, they become no longer merely a private matter but of legitimate public inter

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective