Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There is no similitude or affinity between an external ob... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is no relation of resemblance between an idea and the external material object it ostensibly represents.

    There is no similitude or affinity between an external object and the sensation it produces.

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Related

    If neither link in the chain (object-to-sensation, sensation-to-idea) preserves ...There is no relation of resemblance between an idea and the external material ob...There is no similitude or affinity between a sensation and the idea derived from...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    There is no similitude or affinity between external objects and sensat...97%There is no similitude or affinity between a sensation and the idea de...94%There is no relation of resemblance between an idea and the external m...88%Bodily sensations are mere sensations and do not count as perceptual e...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legrand
    View source passageHide passage
    From the lack of any form of similitude or affinity between object/sensation, and sensation/idea, it follows that there is no such relation which holds between an idea and an external (material) object. From this lack of similitude, Le Grand concluded that adventitious ideas (coming from material objects outside us) must be innate or inbred in the mind. For, if the external object is not like the idea we form of it, then the only explanation remaining is that the mind is responsible for it. Like

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective