Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There is some remote analogy among various operations of ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The analogy between the first cause of the universe and human mind or intelligence is no more plausible than analogies between the first cause and other natural processes.

    There is some remote analogy among various operations of nature, including the rotting of a turnip, the generation of an animal, and the structure of human thought.

    CausationNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Human thought is only one of several natural processes that bear some analogy to...Other analogies to non-mental natural processes are no less plausible than the a...The analogy between the first cause of the universe and human mind or intelligen...

    Similar

    There is an analogy or resemblance between the world and man-made mach...82%All analogies between God and human minds (or other natural processes)...79%Other analogies to non-mental natural processes are no less plausible ...79%Weak and remote analogies are insufficient to establish substantive kn...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    On the interpretation provided, it is clear that Hume’s critique of the argument from design is deep and radical. There are, however, several passages in the final Part of the Dialogues (XII) that suggest that Philo (Hume) reverses or at least moderates his position — making some significant concessions to Cleanthes’s position. The most important evidence of this appears in a passage at the beginning of Part XII where Philo says that no one can be so stupid as to reject the view that there are s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective