Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There is too much variety among aesthetic objects — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A 'divide and conquer' strategy is preferable to identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for defining 'aesthetic object'

    There is too much variety among aesthetic objects

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A 'divide and conquer' strategy is preferable to identifying necessary and suffi...Identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for 'aesthetic object' seemed ou...There is too much disagreement among philosophers about aesthetic objects

    Similar

    There is too much disagreement among philosophers about aesthetic obje...81%The parts of a beautiful object must be distinct enough to convey vari...80%Everyday aesthetics aims to capture the diverse dimensions of aestheti...77%Identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for 'aesthetic object'...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    He adopted it for two reasons. First, approaches of the (a), (b), and (c) sort have numerous and serious problems (Aesth: 60–63). Second, if art criticism can amount to knowledge, as Beardsley believes it can, then what’s called for is an object of study that can be examined in its own right, in respect to its own objective qualities. Both of these factors led him in search of an objective definition of “aesthetic object”. Since, however, identifying necessary and sufficient conditions seemed ou

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective