Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There must be a certain way in which each of a subject's ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    There must be a certain way in which each of a subject's representations is unified in the subject, and this way is judgment.

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Representations must be unified in the subject in some determinate manner.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Judgment is the manner in which given cognitions are brought to the objective unity of apperception (B141).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume's bundle theory demonstrates that associative contiguity and resemblance can bind representations without requiring a judging subject.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If Humean association produces functional unity of representations, judgment is sufficient but not necessary for representational unification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's argument from B141 assumes objective unity requires apperception, but this conflates epistemic normativity with psychological unification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Pre-reflective bodily experience (Merleau-Ponty's motor intentionality) unifies representations without propositional judgment structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Perceptual synthesis in skilled action coheres phenomenologically prior to any act of predication or conceptual subsumption.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Hume's bundle theory demonstrates that associative contiguity and resemblance ca...If Humean association produces functional unity of representations, judgment is ...Judgment is the manner in which given cognitions are brought to the objective un...Kant's argument from B141 assumes objective unity requires apperception, but thi...
    +3 moreShow less
    Perceptual synthesis in skilled action coheres phenomenologically prior to any a...Pre-reflective bodily experience (Merleau-Ponty's motor intentionality) unifies ...Representations must be unified in the subject in some determinate manner.

    Similar

    A judgment is a multiple relation of the mind or mental factors to man...87%In a judgment 'S is P', the subject and predicate are meant both to be...85%A judgment intended to be valid at all times and for everyone relates ...85%If a judgment agrees with an object, then all judgments about the same...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    In §19, Kant argues that there must be a certain way in which each of my representations is unified in the subject, and he identifies this way with judgment: “I find that a judgment is nothing but the manner in which given cognitions are brought to the objective unity of apperception” (B141). Judgment, Kant proposes, is objectively rather than subjectively valid, and hence exhibits the type of universality and necessity that characterizes objective validity (B142). He then claims that without sy
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit