Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore a lone thinker cannot have thoughts with conten... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Cartesian assumption that one can be a lone thinker is mistaken

    Therefore a lone thinker cannot have thoughts with content, and thus cannot be a thinker at all

    Consciousness & MindSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    A lone thinker by definition lacks other thinking creatures to triangulate withHaving thoughts with content requires triangulation with other thinking creature...The Cartesian assumption that one can be a lone thinker is mistaken

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The Cartesian assumption that one can be a lone thinker is mistaken87%A lone thinker cannot have thoughts with determinate content87%A lone thinker by definition lacks other thinking creatures to triangu...86%The falsity of having no thoughts at all is self-evident for any think...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transcendental-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    Finally, we may turn to the work of Donald Davidson, who like Putnam bases his transcendental claim on a form of externalism, which links the content of our mental states to how we relate to our environment; but in his case, this idea is directed against skepticism concerning other minds. Thus, while the skeptic holds that the existence of such minds is doubtful, Davidson argues that it would not be possible for a creature like me to have thoughts unless I lived in a world with other creatures w

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective