Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Therefore, a resting body cannot be distinguished, by the... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A resting body, under Descartes' definitions of body and place, would blend indistinguishably into the surrounding plenum.

    Therefore, a resting body cannot be distinguished, by the definition of body, from the surrounding plenum matter that forms the external place of that resting body.

    CausationPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Perception1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A resting body is not being transported.A resting body, under Descartes' definitions of body and place, would blend indi...Descartes defines a body as everything which is simultaneously transported.

    Similar

    A resting body, under Descartes' definitions of body and place, would ...90%Treating matter and bodies as the same thing obscures this distinction...79%Therefore, a body cannot move toward its opposite state (rest or motio...77%A partless body cannot be partly in anything76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes-physics
    View source passageHide passage
    Nevertheless, Descartes’ hypothesis of motion may sanction a species of relative motion, since his phrase, “considered at rest”, implies that the choice of which bodies are at rest or in motion is purely arbitrary. According to the “relational” theory (or at least the more strict versions of relationism), space, time, and motion are just relations among bodies, and not separately existing entities or properties that are in any way independent of material bodies. Motion only exists as a “relative

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective