Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, Abraham's case provides no evidence of duties beyond social norms, only evidence of unverifiable private revelation.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Rejecting all unverifiable claims as evidence eliminates the possibility of knowing about non-empirical moral realities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Abraham's willingness to obey could demonstrate duty to God as a genuine moral obligation, not merely private experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim assumes social norms are the only verifiable moral standard, but this itself requires philosophical justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac violated contemporaneous social norms, suggesting motivation beyond social conformity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Private revelations are inherently unverifiable, making them unsuitable as evidence for objective moral duties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without independent confirmation, we cannot distinguish genuine divine commands from psychological delusion or rationalization.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42