Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore any societal conception of the good presupposes... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting some independent conception of the good of society as a whole

    Therefore any societal conception of the good presupposes the right rather than grounding it

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A conception that must accord a reasonable place for individual claims already i...Any conception of the good of society as a whole must already persuade the indiv...The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting some independent conception of...

    Similar

    The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting some independent con...80%The right cannot be defined in terms of promoting the good76%A conception that must accord a reasonable place for individual claims...74%The concept of a right emerged simultaneously with reflective awarenes...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: dewey-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Pragmatism in ethics is often regarded as a form of teleology or consequentialism. Yet Dewey rejected accounts of the right that defined it in terms of promoting the good (E 214–216). The concept of the right contains an element not contained in the good — namely, that of an authoritative demand. The phenomenology of claims of good and right are also distinct: the good attracts or appeals, whereas claims of right appear to command authority. The demands of the right often conflict with individua

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective