Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore any such causal chain must terminate in X. — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If X is prior in being to everything other than itself, then X is the first cause of existence to any other being Y.

    Therefore any such causal chain must terminate in X.

    CausationNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyCausation

    Related

    Causal chains of existence cannot form circles or infinite regresses.Every being other than X has some cause of its existence distinct from itself.If X is prior in being to everything other than itself, then X is the first caus...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Therefore the causal chain must terminate in a being whose existence i...88%Therefore the chain of causes for any being must terminate in the firs...86%Analysis of causal chains reveals that God is simple.79%A chain of possible things cannot regress infinitely and must terminat...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: al-farabi-metaphysics
    View source passageHide passage
    Fârâbî does not accompany the initial thesis of the Perfect City, “The first being [mawjûd] is the first cause of existence [wujûd] to all other beings [mawjûdât]”, by any explicit proof. What is his strategy for convincing the reader to accept it? On the face of it, there are several ways in which this thesis could be falsified. There might be no first being, because every being has another being prior to it, ad infinitum. Or there might be many beings each of which is “first” in the weak sense

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective